Vincent Van-Gohg

VThe film we found In class was truly intriguing, I truly became acquainted with the character of Van-Gogh and how hard his life was. I truly appreciate this video, however I remain with two principle Ideas that truly change my perspective of Vincent Van-Gogh. Endure with the goal that others don't endure. This thought astounded me, I racket ;t realize that Van-Gogh was a man that wanted to help individuals and that commit the greater part of his life predicating the expression of God.At the age of 20 Van-Gogh was dismissed when he proposed to Ursula. This was extremely miserable for him that his character change a ton, he has irate with everyone aside from God. Van-Gogh toss the entirety of his books with the exception of the good book and right now he was devoted hundred percent to God. Despite the fact that he was committed to God his demeanor noise ‘t change and he got fire from the exhibition he was working since the age of 15. After he got fire, he went to Amsterdam be a minister yet he was dismissed, so he choose to turned into a missioner.Van-Gogh was enduring a great deal he was dismissed by the congregation due to his mentality, UT he commotion ‘t surrender he found the best approach to help and anticipate, He utilize the shocking abilities her mother trained him when he was pretty much nothing and begin foreseeing In his artistic creation. Van-Gogh had a dismal and despairing youth atavist why he was an individual that endure a great deal and comprehend the individuals that endure to. At the point when he was mission he gave his home to others and went with the excavators to live, in this piece of the video they depicted him as an individual that clamor ‘t care to add a greater amount of enduring to his life, however that he noise ‘t need individuals to endure like he did.At the age of 26 he choose to make workmanship centering in the respect of laborers and nature, he consider this lecture through craftsmanship. Van-Gogh enth usiastic work. At 33 years old Van-Gogh went to Paris and he encountered an alternate perspective of workmanship, he change his thought and improved as a craftsman. He was acquainted with impressionism and he was stunned that he begin working with different craftsmen. Between specialists they upheld each other presenting like models, since models were truly expensive.Something that separated Vincent from the other craftsman was that he infuriated constantly, the other craftsman on the grounds that their attention on the impressionism possibly work when the sunlight was acceptable and at whatever point they needed. This truly annoys Van-Gogh, he said different specialists where not energetic enough, I think this was an alternate in instruction, Van-Gogh work since he was 15 years of age, he needed to leave school in light of family prudent issues and this assistance him to turn into a work man since he was close to nothing, to encounter the genuine work and to pick up cash to live In dillydally life.At this time Van-Gogh choose to quit centering In the Impressionism and start Glenn more life to their horrifying and needed to make a worldwide solidarity In his artworks. In any case, his energy didn't have limits, he showed up to the level that he quit eating since he his brushes and this has perilous in view of the synthetic compounds in the paints. Vincent issues made individuals thought of him as a hazardous individual. One day he undermined his flat mate with a blade since they contended constantly, he likewise experience the ill effects of attacks.I imagine that when his sibling got ready for marriage and he quits stressing f Vincent life on account of his family, Vincent got truly focused and miserable. This misery drives him to nearly murder his self and cut his ear, he additionally however of him as a craftsman that will never had a future as a craftsman. Yet, the entirety of his work and exertion was justified, despite all the trouble, after he kicked th e bucket his sibling begin selling a greater amount of his craft and today Vincent Van-Sago's specialty is worth a huge number of dollars. Once in a while we don't comprehend why our work doesn't succeed however time make's it and Vincent in view of his abundances of energy didn't show up to the time where his work got effective.

Television Talk Shows Essay -- Entertainment Papers

TV Talk Shows The United States’ longest running project is really a news/syndicated program considered Meet the Press. It started as a radio program in 1945, and had little changes when it was circulated on NBC for the main half-hour transmission in November 1947. Meet the Press May have been the main syndicated program to be appeared on TV, however it wasn’t the primary normally planned television show. Sylvester Weaver delivered the principal consistently customized syndicated program called Broadway Open House from May 1950 to August 1951. Two Veteran Jerry Lester and Morey Amsterdam, who were stand up comics, shared the facilitating obligations for this discussion/assortment program. Broadway Open House was a blend of schedules, singing, moving and parody, which would begin a pattern of new television shows to before long follow. The Tonight Show gazing Johnny Carson, which debuted October 1, 1962, was one of those shows that followed Broadway Open House. With Johnny’s li ttle rivalry, showing up on his show got one of the principal enormous breaks for some, up and coming stars out and about of acclaim and fortune. His show turned out to be large to such an extent that Johnny arranged an arrangement with NBC to give him 2 million dollars for every year, while his taping plan included twelve weeks of four shows week by week, twenty-five weeks of just three shows per week, and fifteen weeks of excursion. A portion of the stars that made got their beginning on The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson were individuals like Jerry Seinfield, Roseanne, and Gary Shandling. At the point when Johnny Carson chose to resign, his demonstrate was given to humorist Jay Leno, making The Tonight Show one of the best and longest running shows ever. Early Morning Talk Shows A run of the mill morning for most Americans comprises of having a generous breakfast, drin... ...9.htm Larry King Live Retrieved October 29, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.cnn.com/larryking Scott, Gini, Graham. (1996) Can we Talk? The Power and Influence of Talk Shows. New York: Plenum Press. Review. â€Å"Reason for Watching Talk Shows.† Nov. 1, 2001. Review. â€Å"Talk Shows Watched by Students.† Nov.1 2001. Studios USA(2001). Report: Maury Povich. Nov. 1, 2001. Recovered from the World Wide Web:http//www.studiosusa.com/maury/html. The Rosie O’Donnell Show. Oct. 20, 2001. Recovered from the World Wide Web: http://ytv.yahoo.com/fc/ytv/rosie_o_donnell_show. Tolson, Andrew. (Eds.). (2001). TV Talk Shows. New Jersey, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. T.V. Syndicated programs( 2001). Report: Research on T.V. Television shows. Oct. 18, 2001. Recovered from the World Wide Web: http://www.Missouri.edu/~advcf/television talk-shows.html.

Ethics in Information Technology :: Technology Ethics

Morals in Information Technology Innovation Department Innovation is from numerous points of view exceptionally advantageous to our general public, however in what ways can as well as will this quickly developing business be deceptive. This article clarifies the force and data that an IT staff has in the business world. The vast majority think about the IT individual as somebody who comes to fix their PC when they can't make sense of their email. Be that as it may, what does an IT individual approach. Each business is unique and has various obligations required for the IT work force. This article clarifies how most organizations utilize the IT division for checking their representatives on the PC. The article brings up numerous issues on the moral practices of IT work force, yet it doesn't offer numerous responses. That is on the grounds that the topic of Is it moral? must be replied by every individual IT proficient. In other expert professions, for example, Medicine or Law that have been around for quite a while have a lot of laws or c ode of morals that accompanies the activity. This field presently can't seem to build up such guidelines. The article expresses that most moral issues, for example, perusing the worker messages and evolving words, utilizing key lumberjacks to acquire everything a particular individual has composed, or screen catch projects to screen all that they have taken a gander at, have not been faced by law, nor is there a standard that any IT proficient needs to follow. It's startling to think how much force and data that an IT proficient approach, and the way that there are no laws that deny a portion of the methods they is likewise a terrifying idea. Indeed, even at Southwestern Assemblies of God University the IT individuals approach our government managed savings number, website pages we visit, and even our web passwords like email or understudy login. In the event that the IT proficient are employed and have no earlier attentiveness of moral issues how might we believe what they will do with the data they have about us. I believe that the businesses at Southwestern have picked the ideal individuals for the activity, however what the ordinary office of America. The article expresses that a portion of the IT experts even assistance workers to get others terminated. A case of this would be: At this specific business the IT office gets all the messages to be screened before they leave to the beneficiary.

Mass Shootings and Related Issues of Race and Gender

Mass Shootings and Related Issues of Race and Gender â€Å"Sick,† â€Å"twisted,† â€Å"disturbed,† â€Å"psychotic,† â€Å"mentally ill,† â€Å"psychopath,† â€Å"acted alone.† These wordsâ are recognizable to any individual who focuses on news records of mass shootings completed by white guys in the course of the most recent three decades. Inconvenience is, none of these folks Eliot Rodger, Adam Lanza, James Holmes, Jared Loughner, Anders Breivik in Norway, among others-truly acted alone. While news accounts regularly outline mass shootings by white guys as the work ofâ deranged people, the activities of theseâ men and young men are expressive of generally held man centric and racial oppressor convictions. They are the indication ofâ a debilitated society. Theâ shooters who left advanced path have clarified that their activities were provoked by their apparent loss of intensity and status in the public arena. They felt insulted by ladies who don't obey them and their wants, by ethnic minorities and eccentric people who have battled for, earned, and safeguarded their social equality, and by a general public that doesn’t bear the cost of them the regard and spot they accept they merit unintentionally of their race and sexual orientation. They are the result of a changed and ever-changing social setting in which notable types of intensity and mastery are by and large gradually yet boisterously destabilized, and of a general public that mingles them to accept this isn't right, and that they have the right to be in places of intensity. Segment Shifts in the U.S. also, Anomie Among White Men​ Writing in 1897, humanist Émile Durkheim advanced a hypothetical idea that can beâ usefully applied to seeing how this apparent issue of people is really a social issue. Anomie, Durkheim clarified, is a condition that outcomes when the qualities and desires for an individual don't coordinate those that prevail in the public eye. At the point when an individual encounters anomie, they feel separated from their general public; they feel destabilized. Anomie, per Durkheim, is a condition of social disturbance. Applying the hypothesis of anomie to the marvel of white male shooters tosses into help the states of social confusion experienced by young men and men who make such move. White guys, particularly those with financial benefit comparative with others, have generally inhabited the highest point of the force chain of command in the United States. They hold power as far as their sex, their race, now and then their class, and frequently, their sexuality. In any case, in today’s social setting in which man controlled society, heteronormativity, racial domination, and financial force have been destabilized by different social developments, enactment, and outlook changes in famous awareness, their control over others is winding down. With it, so too is their verifiably shamefully swelled economic wellbeing. The Violent Death Grip of Patriarchy and White Supremacy It is not necessarily the case that man centric society, heteronormativity, racial domination, and financial control by white men are relics of days gone by. These types of mastery live today in a wide assortment of perspectives, qualities, convictions, and practices. The activities of white male shooters make it lethally evident that the belief systems that undergird these types of persecution are alive, however flourishing today. They are communicated in their generally clear and alarming structures in the Youtube recordings, visit logs, discussions, and declarations of Anders Breivik, Elliot Rodger, and Jared Loughner, among others. They were communicated with brutality and disdain in a rash of despise violations against ladies, ethnic minorities, LGBT individuals, and foreigners following the 2016 presidential political decision. In this social setting of anomie, shooting others is an edgy endeavor to recover standards lost. It is a statement of intensity that has been destabilized by the changing idea of society, its standards, and its qualities. However, the activities of white male shooters are framed inside the bigger social issue of a pained manliness that rises above race. Seen through a more extensive focal point, the associations between shootings executed by white guys and different types of fierce manly articulation, similar to road provocation, gendered and sexualized viciousness, loathe violations, group brutality, and white nonconformist and patriot developments become clear. Society Needs Masculinity Rooted in Respect and Care for Others A social issue like this requires a social arrangement. Personal investigations and changes to weapon laws may lessen firearm savagery, yet they won't stop different types of brutality that come from a social disorder. Easing the social disorder of prejudice, and the gendered and heterosexist standards of patriarchyâ is work that must be done on the whole by us all. We, as a general public, must reconfigure what manliness means, and push off the risky qualities and desires that we mingle young men to hold and express in their conduct. Relieving this social disorder requires another manliness segregated from ideas of predominance, strength, control, and consistence of others. It requires what the authors at Rad Dad advocate for in their require a Feminist Fathers’ Day: a manliness prefaced on regard and care for other people.

Liberty vs responsibility

Freedom v/s Responsibility Liberty is the most esteemed and looked for after result of any political society. It is a characteristic of a gainful and prosperous society where individuals appreciate a lot of central rights for e. g. :- option to free discourse, reasonable preliminary, and so forth. Then again social obligation towards others and oneself joins the network and expands social prosperity. Different political logicians have thought of various approaches to organize one over the other and some have accepted to find some kind of harmony between the two.This prompts a fascinating political discussion that when we draw a line etween freedom and obligation, where in we have greatest freedom and least duty. In this paper I state the libertarian political idea which settle this discussion by finding some kind of harmony among freedom and duty. To help my contention, I apply the thoughts of John Locke who was a seventeenth century traditional liberal thinker (for first explanation ) and a lot of libertarian political idea is roused from his works. For second explanation I apply the thoughts of libertarian savant Friedrich Hayek.Towards the end I examine the standards of libertarianism which plainly address this contention. The main explanation is the essential motivation behind why individuals want to plunder or loot and that reason is shortage. Shortage is additionally the primary motivation behind why we need to keep a lot of rules and act capably. On the off chance that there were no shortage, at that point there would be an excess of products and assets for everybody and any individual's desires and wants would be satisfied regardless of how boundless they were and his/her activities would have no result on any other person. In any case, we do experience a daily reality such that there is shortage and that can't be avoided.So, we need to collaborate and trade merchandise with each other and that includes a lot of rules for social lead. In this unique circ umstance, John Locke trusted in the legitimate gathering of property (rare great) by blending work in with normal assets (Nozick 175). He didn't have confidence in amassing of property through compulsion, extortion or robbery. Most definitely he accepted that an excess of property ought not be devoured that next to no is left for others since that would frustrate another person's entitlement to aggregation of private property.Nozick had given this a term â€Å"Lockean Proviso† (Nozick 175). Applying the Lockean stipulation to the contention among freedom and duty, within the sight of carcity, there must be a sure arrangement of obligations that individuals need to satisfy (referenced above, Locke called them â€Å"natural laws† (Korab)) essentially including the one where they don't over-devour assets so less is left for other people and simultaneously appreciate the freedoms allowed by the implicit agreement. It's essential to take note of that the duties are ideal th at if there are pretty much obligations there will be less to no liberty.The second explanation is that duty is significant for freedom to exist is that it supports great dynamic by making individuals responsible for their activities. Friedrich Hayek in his book â€Å"Constitution of Liberty' said that a free society depends more than some other on individuals being considered liable for their activities (â€Å"American Spectator†) Applying his thought, in light it one is granted tor accomplishing a set ot objectives by the correct utilization of assets he/she was given, at that point that individual ought to likewise not be caused and made to endure the results of making an awful decision.In the long haul, this enduring will assist him with settling on better choices. Furthermore, if the individual doesn't endure the results, he/she will build up an affinity for xcessive hazard taking which wouldn't be useful for the general public. Another ramifications of not assuming lia bility is that another person winds up assuming liability for it and afterward that individual has an option to control the last's opportunity. For e. g. :- if the administration chooses to bailout a firm which didn't settle on right choices, at that point the legislature will constrain the organization to take some hard choices which may conflict with the premiums of the individuals in that company.So, figuring out how to assume liability from terrible decisions expands self-possession and in this way maintains one's freedom. It additionally improves one-self hich is constantly useful towards society. Libertarianism has two fundamental standards: the non-animosity rule and the safeguarding of individual rights and private property (â€Å"Libertarianism†). As indicated by Libertarianism these are the main two obligations the individual owes to others in the network. He/she should not to show animosity and infringe upon some other individual's privileges in the community.Any o bligation more than that comes at the expense of freedom. In light of the reasons that I gave, Libertarianism finds some kind of harmony among freedom and obligation by not setting laws that accomplish a particular result not at all like an eviathan government. At the normal occasions the laws that it places are negligible and just lead to a further development of freedom among all. One doesn't need such a large number of laws since that prompts an amazing government where there is no freedom and one additionally can't oversee not having any laws since shortage and covetousness will prompt a condition of war of â€Å"one against all†.Libertarianism gives an answer that is somewhere close to those two boundaries. To finish up, libertarianism puts stock in the significance of individual freedom which can be found in the essential rights that individuals appreciate and obligations/duties hich individuals are committed to follow. It's significant for crucial obligations to exist in light of the fact that without which freedom won't exist. In any case, obligation wouldn't have any importance without freedom and that it gets its reality from the nearness of the last mentioned.

The Tension Between Inner Self and Outer Self

The Tension Between Inner Self and Outer Self Stress Management Print The Tension Between Inner and Outer Self By Arlin Cuncic Arlin Cuncic, MA, is the author of Therapy in Focus: What to Expect from CBT for Social Anxiety Disorder and 7 Weeks to Reduce Anxiety. Learn about our editorial policy Arlin Cuncic Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on June 23, 2018 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on February 15, 2020 Getty Images More in Stress Management Effects on Health Management Techniques Situational Stress Job Stress Household Stress Relationship Stress The tension between the inner self and outer self is common in the modern world. Each of us is tugged in multiple directions every day and our actions and behaviors do not always align with our core values as a result. However, becoming aware of your inner self and how it balances with your outer self is the foundation for good mental, physical, and spiritual health.?? This is why it is an important aspect to consider when working on a good balance in your life. The Outer Self At times it is helpful to present a different outer self to the world than what we experience on the inside. Most of us weigh the pros and cons of sharing our true feelings depending on what we expect in each set of circumstances. Our outer self is what we present to the world, and we usually try to curate it to reflect the best. However, problems arise when this becomes a habitual pattern at the expense of your true feelings. The outer self is generally concerned with material things, such as how you present yourself (hair, clothes, etc.), as well as groups you belong to or personas that you portray. Your outer self spends its time coping with the demands of school, work, home life, and whatever other real-world distractions you experience each day. This external world can be demanding, leaving little time for you to consider whether what is taking place on the outside of your life matches what you ultimately desire on the inside. The Inner Self In contrast to the outer self, the inner self is about what cant be seen: feelings, intuition, values, beliefs, personality, thoughts, emotions, fantasies, spirituality, desire, and purpose. A strong inner self means that you cope well with your emotions, are self-aware, have clarity and a good sense of your values, and feel a purpose in life. It also means that you are able to remain calm and resilient in the face of adversity from the outer world. Conflict Between Inner and Outer Self Problems begin when the inner self and outer self are in conflict or out of balance. In its simplest terms, a conflict between the inner and outer self refers to a mismatch: you think one thing but do another. The greater the conflict, the wider the difference between what the inner self believes is right and what the outer self does. This conflict ultimately causes stress that can be damaging to the mind, body, and spirit.?? Often, this conflict arises due to spending too little time considering your inner self. How much of the time are you running on empty, just struggling to get through the demands of the day, without considering whether your actions and behaviors are in line with your inner self? The conflict between the two selves can result in stress, which makes you more vulnerable to illness. Your daily functioning may also be affected. You may feel successful on the outside but empty on the inside. When this happens, you may also be at risk for quick fixes to heal your pain, such as turning to drugs or alcohol.   One way to identify if you are experiencing a conflict between your inner and outer selves is to identify gaps between your true values and outer actions. Take a moment and list your core values. These might be things like believing in the value of honesty, integrity, friendship, helpfulness, etc.Now, for each value, make a list of activities that you do each day that is in alignment with that value. Examples might include calling friends to see how they are doing or telling the truth even when it is difficult.Finally, look for values that have little actions each day to support them. This is where you will find your conflict. If you value friendship but spend each day alone, that reflects a conflict between your values (inner self) and actions (outer self). Balancing the Inner and Outer Self Once youve identified the problematic areas in your life, it is time to begin quieting your outer self with a goal of connecting with your inner self. Slow down, focus on the moment, and listen to your thoughts as you go about your day. If you still feel in conflict, consider whether you might need to make life changes to address these issues. Perhaps a new job, change of relationship, or ending of friendships might be in order. Only you will know what specific changes might help to align you with your true inner self. While thinking about what changes you need to make, it may be helpful to ask yourself the following questions: What do you most want to pursue in life? Does this match what you are doing?Will you feel good about the choices you are making at the end of your life?Does your current life require you to stifle deeply held values? Go back to the gaps that you identified in the previous section, and start with the largest ones. Ask yourself what changes you will need to make to align your inner and outer selves. For example, one person might choose to change careers or reduce working hours to spend more time with family. Another person might change his or her field of work to more closely align with his or her values. You might find that only simple changes need to be made, such as slowing down each day and taking the time to talk and listen to others, rather than always being in a rush. Sometimes the conflict between our inner and outer selves is not that large and doesnt take that much to address. A Word From Verywell If you are struggling with a conflict between your inner and outer self, this could also be reflective of an underlying mental health problem. If the above steps do not work to reconcile the problems you are having, consider meeting with your doctor or a mental health professional to uncover the source of your conflict and to address it through appropriate treatment.

Discovery in Robert Grays Poetry Katherine Mansfields The Garden - Literature Essay Samples

Discoveries that challenge what one does in their everyday lives and what one sees as acceptable allows them to reassess their place in the world and forces greater understanding of it. Through viewing the world through fresh eyes, one offers themselves insight into something that may have been previously disregarded or concealed. Composers explore how discoveries encourage re-evaluation of situations, evident in the poems ‘Late Ferry’ and ‘The Meatworks’ by Robert Gray, an Australian imagist poet, where he delves into the consequences of economic progress despite it being widely accepted in modern society, allowing the reader to make informed opinions on the subject. Similarly, in the short story ‘The Garden Party’ by Katherine Mansfield, a well-to-do modernist writer, the reader is taken on a journey as the character reflects on her privileged lifestyle, and in turn causes the reader to reassess their own life. Reflection on the simple beauty of nature as opposed to the overwhelming consumerism in society leads to deeper understanding and appreciation of life. By separating oneself from the everyday one is able to reassess popular opinion and what society values. In the poem ‘Late Ferry’, Gray brings the reader along on the Ferry’s journey in the â€Å"huge, dark harbour†, which becomes a catalyst for Gray’s own opinions. The ferry itself represents the fragility of humankind, being bombarded by the push towards materialism. Gray uses personification and simile to describe how the city is both alluring and dangerous. In the lines â€Å"Ahead,/ neon redness trembles/down in the water/ as if into ice†, Gray alludes to ‘red light districts’ to symbolize humanity’s lust, but also how this creates discomfort of the artificial as it becomes consuming. The city is a mantle of seduction, distracting us from the fact that what it advertise s as fulfillment actually brings the opposite – an unremitting greed. Gray argues that freeing ourselves from society’s constructs and appreciating nature helps create satisfaction in life. Ending the poem with the use of synaesthesia and simile, he demonstrates the intense yet calming power of reflection. â€Å"I can find it while it’s on darkness,/ like tasting honeycomb,/ filled as it is with its yellow light.† This communicates the idea that clarity comes from ‘darkness’, that is, a lack of artificial distractions, and that life can be enriched by an understanding of nature. The color yellow is often associated with joy and calm, and so ending with this shows that peace is found with contemplation. Gray uses the persona to reveal discoveries that he made whilst living in Sydney. Likewise, in the short story, ‘The Garden Party’, Katherine uses the character of Laura to display her own discoveries as she questioned and learnt m ore about the world, which she made whilst growing up in a privileged family in the late 1800s. She uses the death of the poor neighbor as a means of confronting both the character and the reader with the harshness of life, but simultaneously the beauty of it. By allowing Lauren to briefly separate herself from her sheltered lifestyle and expose her to reality, both she and the reader can gain a new awareness of the delicacy of existence itself, and the prospect of life after death. Using rhetorical question after Lauren sees the dead man highlights realization: â€Å"What did garden parties and baskets and lace frocks matter to him?†. This brings to attention how although society aligns financial success directly to fulfillment in life, when we die it becomes unimportant. One’s legacy is not held in their former possessions, but the impact they continue to have on others even after death, as if they were only â€Å"sleeping†. The simple beauty in the circle of life allows one to reassess the workings of society. By separating oneself and reflecting, deeper understanding of the world and nature can be gained. Confronting discoveries that question one’s perceptions can offer a broader understanding of the world, by forcing a reassessment of one’s values. A push to financial and social success has begun to overwhelm society and has created a divide between those who value humanity and compassion, versus those who disregard it for their own social and/or financial gain. In ‘The Meatworks’, Gray rediscovers the meat factory he describes and reflects on the lack of respect and humanity that goes into food production, often unseen by today’s consumers. Gray separates the persona from the workers, who disregard humanity in favor of income as â€Å"most of them worked around the slaughtering†. This exclusivity highlights Gray’s disgust for those who have become mindless murderers all for some â€Å"frail green money†. In the quote â€Å"you found, around the nails, there was still blood.† Gray alludes to Lady Macbeth, as no amount of t rying can wash away past actions, and stating this as a fact, connects the physical matter to the permanent, physiological wounds. Gray uses his own experiences of working as a butcher to make the reader have confronting realizations of the cruelties that come with consumerism. In ‘The Garden Party’, Laura discovers her family’s indifference towards a death, something which she is deeply affected by. Their sense of ‘false Eden’ and superiority over lower classes creates a lack of morals and humanity towards those less fortunate. Like the pigs are slaughtered in the meatworks, to them, this tragedy is distant and insignificant. Mansfield foreshadows this event when Laura’s sister, Jose, sings a song about life being â€Å"Wee-ary†. The use of irony brings to attention the ignorance of the privileged, confronting the reader with the family’s lack of benevolence before the event happens in the quote â€Å"her face broke into a bril liant, unsympathetic smile†. Though the lyrics are sad, Jose is unable to sing with true compassion and instead finds amusement in them. The family’s continuous insistence on extravagance rather than sympathy gives the reader a deeper understanding of how classes and materialistic based values can warp basic human nature. Through these confronting discoveries, the reader reflects on what they value, and through this, becomes more knowledgeable. Challenging the everyday and reflecting on society and one’s own values can lead to a reassessment of one’s views of the world to better understand it. Composers like Gray and Mansfield take us on a journey of discovery, to enlighten and inform the reader, resulting in renewed opinions. A rejection of materialism is presented through their works as a means of gaining greater insight into that which is often overlooked and underappreciated. Through discovery, one can form their own views and not simply accept the fact that society believes ‘progress’ is the only road to fulfillment in the modern world.